Philosophical vs Psychological Perspectives on Moral Values

In the Ethics Introductory course where you may be enrolled in a university or university philosophy course, subjects of ethical value are often integrated into discussion of ethics theory. This association limits the range of moral values ​​to be discussed, but that is still a very important association.

By contrast, when moral centers are talking about moral values, they do not attempt to map certain moral values ​​to specific moral theories. To explain the moral values ​​when explaining the differences in moral behavior and to explain why specific moral values ​​play a greater role in specific moral and psychological science, Pay attention to descriptive classification. Project person is better than others

These two perspectives, philosophy and psychology are equally important for critical thinking about moral literacy and morality.

I am convinced that this integrated approach will provide a more effective foundation for learning how to create persuasive and convincing moral arguments.

An integrated approach is also essential to understand the proper role and limitation of moral arguments in the framework of our personal and social life.

Many philosophers engaged in moral psychology research understand that their subjects have limited experience. Philosophers use two main methods to use empirical results in moral psychology. One is to criticize the philosophical discourse of moral psychology using empirical results (and empirical theory from psychology) (see eg Doris 2002), about our moral and psychological science See hypothesis See eg Nichols 2004. For those who believe that part (or all) of our moral psychology is based on congenital abilities, evolutionary psychology is a good source of information based on empirical and empirical theory. An explanation of the composition of our moral psychology comes from a large modular description of the structure of the mind. This position is currently being widely debated by philosophers in the field of moral psychology. The following is an example of this explanation.

Once the philosophical position is separated and the relevant empirical literature is deduced, it can begin to evaluate the rationality of philosophical moral heart physics. What? In short, is the picture of philosophy enough empirically? If the philosophical concept is judged empirically sufficient, the result will be evidence. Conversely, if it turns out that problematic philosophical moral and psychology is empirically inappropriate, the result is that the philosophical theory presupposing problematic moral psychology is modified, changed or even dismissed. . This process is usually relatively