Philosophical Thinking: Humans and Animals

There are many philosophical ideas about whether humans should give moral status to animals and what they should give to animals in an acceptable moral system. Some philosophers believe that proper handling of animals and direct moral concerns are unfounded. Because the use of animals by humans is considered part of the natural life process. In contrast, other philosophers see animals like humans. These philosophers believe that animals have the ability to feel positive emotions and negative emotions and emotions, suffer as human beings, and therefore have a moral status.

In the context of nature or philosophy, humans are defined as symbols of animals. This word was made by German philosopher Ernst Kassilla. Cassirer considers human characteristics not to be his metaphysical or physical properties, but to his work, not to the human rationale as an animal proposed by Aristotle. Humanity must be understood through analysis of symbols. With this principle you can understand the nature of man by exploring symbolic shapes in every aspect of human experience. This event created our history

Human beings have a deep and irreversible connection with the natural world and the animals that satisfy them. Animal and human civilization explores religious, social, cultural, political and philosophical elements of human-animal relationship. Over the years, animals have helped humans understand themselves and the world. Animals identify humans as a metaphor of art and literature, and divide them according to tribes, ethnic groups and communities (sax). Understanding the human relationships of animals can increase our understanding of ourselves, our community, our society and our civilization. Even in the modern world, many people are separated from the natural world, and humans are still connected with animals. This course clearly shows that even those far away from contact with animals maintain a deep and unchanging relationship with them through media, religion, symbolism, fables, and basic needs It is.

Philosophers who are beginning to look for features distinguishing humans from other animals rarely abandon these humans by confusing them with other animals. It is easy to understand why it is not. If we do not rethink our attitudes towards other animals, we have to follow this path, which will lead us to painful experiments for mentally ill people for reasons we can ignore. . For most philosophers these results are as unacceptable as they should cease handling non-human views this way.