Pesticides: Feeding the World

Insecticide: Providing food to the world every day has new concerns about over-population and the future of the planet. People are afraid of starvation and endemic disease. The current problem of food production is not a lack of land, but the output is too low to respond to the doubling of the world population. Plant geneticists are creating hybrid plants with higher yields and greater resistance to undesirable harmful organisms. Even new plants must use pesticides to maximize the potential of hybrids.

According to the recent UN report, the environmental and human health costs due to the use of pesticides are "catastrophic" and the report reveals that pesticides are essential for global population growth. Chemical companies such as Monsanto, Bayer and Dow DuPont are selling stories about the need to double the chemical "war with nature" to feed the world. However, if you are developing yourself now and in the future, you need to protect clean water, healthy soil, and biodiversity as a basis for agriculture. According to the United Nations, chemical-intensive agriculture leads us in the opposite direction, bringing about 3 trillion dollars worldwide environmental damage every year.

Would you listen to or read essential pesticides? Without extensive release of these hazardous substances into the environment, can we not exploit the world of hunger? Is the advantage of pesticides bigger than risk? Pesticide manufacturers and even some farmers are irritated with predictions, but there is strong evidence that they can produce adequate and healthy food supply without relying heavily on chemical pesticides. In this article, we introduce the outline of regulatory deficiencies in the welfare of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), so-called profit developments, and success stories by growers other than chemistry, and we can realize productive and sustainable agriculture indicate. In the future, there is no current pesticide poisoning in agriculture.