personality theory:victor frankl vs carl rogers

Personality - Why Carl Rogers and Victor Frankel live to a certain point without knowing what the meaning of life is. I do not know what kind of way to go, I do not know if there is energy and courage to discover the truth that exists in this world. Some people go through the children in the street on the Cape Town Road, looking sideways with fear and immediately lock the "not obvious" elbows; in the interior of a warm, safe and comfortable new sports model. Others may turn to blindness, ignore regret and may even swear or curse such troubles.

Responsible Runner: FREUD V. ROGERS 1 Floyd and Roger Smirna Davis - Washington Rocky Mountain University FREUD V. ROGERS 2 Abstract This article describes Sigmund Freud's psychoanalysis theory and Karl Rogers. "The main principle of customer-centered theory is to compare and contrast these two theories and to analyze their strengths and weaknesses and further empirically support the theory of choice, which is the most important in the treatment of psychological disorders V. ROGERS 3 Freud and Rogers stated that psychology theory can not be separated from his theorized theorist and cultural and social background as well as all scientific theories. (Rutherford, 2000). Analysis may support this argument.

Since the beginning of personality research, personality theory has provided various explanations about behavior and composition of human beings. In this article I will introduce Carl Rogers' humanitarian personality theory in more detail. Rogers' personality theory derives from his work as a clinical psychologist and has evolved into a field of his client-centric (later known as human-centered) theory of therapy (Rogers, 1959). He is a therapist first and foremost respects human dignity and treats people as subjects, not objects. Rogers' approach to human research is phenomenological and concrete. His view on human behavior is "very reasonable" (Rogers, 1961, p. 194). Furthermore, in his view, "The essence of human nature is essentially positive" (1961, p. 73), he is a "reliable creature" (1977, 7 pages). These beliefs are reflected in his character theory