Permitting Abortion and Prohibiting Prenatal Harm

There is a fundamental contradiction in banning prenatal injury while enabling abortion. (1) This contradiction can be explained by personality and women's rights. I would like to propose a new fourth solution that clarifies this contradiction and wishes to consider three solutions born from existing literature. In terms of contradictory character, contradiction is like this. Is abortion permitted or allowed? The fetus is not a person, but the fetus is a person, so prenatal injuries are prohibited or deprecated.

Abortion Law permits, prohibits, restricts or otherwise regulates the availability of abortion. Abortion is controversial in many societies in terms of religion, morality, morality, practice, politics. It is often forbidden and subject to legal restrictions. But even if it is illegal, abortion is still common in many areas. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) abortion rate is the same in countries where legal procedures are not legal as there are no modern contraceptives in areas where abortion is illegal.

Through the 19th century, each country passed a law prohibiting abortion. Half of the world lives in places where abortion is required. A quarter of the world's people live in places where abortion is permitted to protect women's health. In 1900, 56 to 60 million abortions occurred (Hogue, 60). Of these, 30 million people are in the clinic. It was not until the 1970s that the United States could legally abort. In the 1990s, a law was passed which obliges girls to notify their parents before abortion. In addition to rape, incest or mothers' lives, the Legislature prohibits abortion. In the 1980s, half of abortion was done in an independent clinic. There are abortion of 27 American women each year (Hogue, 60). In countries without contraception, abortion rates are highest. Most women with abortion have sense of loss and regret