Pericles and Alexander 3 Pages 754 Words

Cultural development - Cultural evolution, cultures evolve from simple and low level to more advanced, mature, more complex, new ideas, technologies and innovative lives. It is a way. Pellicle and Alexander are known as the two Greek heroes, bringing culturally developed Greece. Fortunately, these two heroes mature Greece today. If Pellicle and Alexander did not help to change Greece, then we will not make much progress today.

If you want to be a ruler of prosperity, you should always know what you want to achieve for your empire. Pellicle had three main goals during his reign - he wanted to strengthen, unite, unite, build an empire, and admire Athens in his democracy

Pellicle has a better democratic vision. Pellicle first increased the number of paid staff. Then he opened the democracy of Athens to the public. This means that even the poorest citizens can serve if they are elected.

Pellicle also tried to rebuild the Athenian Empire. After the Persians were defeated, Athens helped organize the Derry Union. Pellicle also made Athens navy the strongest navy in the Mediterranean. The Navy made it possible for Athens to gain some prosperity. Because it allowed them to trade overseas in order to obtain important supplies like food and other raw materials.

The last thing the pellicle wants to achieve for his empire is to make it very beautiful. So the Parthenon temple was built at 447-432 b.c pellicle. The Parthenon temple is a temple built by a Greek architect. This wonderful building is estimated at approximately 23,000 square feet. As part of the high-level Athens pellicle, I persuaded the Athens Diet to buy gold, ivory and marble for artists, architects, and workers who used these materials for their work.

As a brilliant example, please see the Burris Chris funeral speech at the Peloponnesus War in the history of Thucydides. Thucydides literally tells the famous Athenian leader Pellicle (the builder of the Parthenon Temple), which tells the citizens of Athens the dead killed to defend the city. Thucydides thought that we were really there, actually heard a story of a wonderful Pericles, but of course we were not at all there. Speech is a trick; in history, the pellicle did not use the words written by Thucydides.

Thucydides' contemporary critics, in conjunction with other contemporary historians and writers, actually describe the Pericles themselves, about the number of the Pericles that historians gave, how many of them are freelance literature I made a speech on whether it was a work. The problem took a different position. Interpretation of Thucydides Because Pericles did not write or distribute his speech, historians can not reliably answer this question. Thucydides reproduced three of them from memory, so it was not certain whether he did not add his own idea and thought.

As a pellicle worshiper, Thucydides (historian) believes that Athens is "nominally democratic, but in reality, was dominated by its first citizen." Through this commentary, historians detail in detail what he considers pellicle's leadership, persuasive power, and sometimes even maneuverability. Thucydides mentioned the fine of Pericle, but he did not mention about accusations of Pericles, but focused on the integrity of Pericles. On the other hand, in his conversation, Plato opposed the pellicle's praise and declared as follows. "To the best of my knowledge, Pellicle was lazy, stupid and greedy by the Athenians by launching a public charging system."