Patient Safety Movement

Operational Patient Safety Solutions (APSS) is a powerful and effective tool that helps health care workers take steps to reduce the mortality of preventable patients in hospitals.

In 2018, the Patient Safety Campaign Foundation held the world conference on the 6th patient safety, science and technology, and announced the impact of our global connectivity point.

It is our mission to achieve the dynamics of 2020 and you can imagine that by 2020 we will eliminate preventable death.

Anesthesiology department has played a pioneering role in developing patient safety campaign and safety medical standards. The anesthesiologist first wrote the concept of "patient safety" at the first meeting of "International Committee for Prevention of Anesthesia Mortality and Incidence" held in Boston, USA in 1984 . The first organization dedicated to the concept of patient safety was the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation established in the United States in 1985. This independent organization is the result of considerable effort by relevant medical professionals and has received relevant industry and government regulatory bodies. The first Harvard monitoring standard for intraoperative anesthesia treatment was the first detailed medical practice standard officially announced (26). They stimulated the American Society of Anesthesiologists to adopt their "basic intraoperative monitoring standard" in 1986.

Healthcare Quality Campaign is similarly born from the definition of abstract patient safety and uses various methods to deal with more specific basic elements. IOM defines patient safety as "preventing harm to the patient" Focus on 1 care system (1) prevent mistakes, (2) learn from mistakes, (3) medical specialty Organization's Safety Culture and Patients Fostering Homes 1,10 AHRQ Patient Safety Net The glossary of the Web site extends the definition of injury prevention "There is no accidental or preventable medical care11.

In the patient safety campaign in the medical field, the number of medical deaths reported prompted rapid and powerful action by Congress and other federal agencies. Unfortunately, much of the effort is focused on the physical constitution of malpractice. "As long as humans are providing services via a complex delivery system, we can predict a high error rate, and humans often make mistakes, even if they make mistakes at the right time." (Hyman & Silver 2005 , P. 56). These laws reflect how people make causal judgments, especially hindsight. Knowing the results, there is bias in the judgment of the process leading to this result. In retrospect, reviewers unduly simplify the situation faced by practitioners and make it impossible to see deeper stories under the heading "human error". (Billings & Woods, 2001)