Pascal's Wager: To Believe or Not to Believe in God

Everyone can believe that they do not have the "human" knowledge of the body. People can put all their beliefs in God who may or may not exist. Although religion has been part of the existence of human being since its founding, Christianity was formed less than 2000 years ago and not completely abolished, suggesting that there must be certain evidence of this religion. Christianity, Pascal's own religion and bet is based on the world's largest religion, including more than 2 billion people with up to 30 denominations in the world.

In order to explain the first point, I would like to propose a transformation of a famous argument in religious philosophy, Pascal's bet. Pascal 's bet is like this: you should try to believe in God, at least you should believe in God. Because, if you do not believe in God, you will miss infinite happiness in heaven. Confront it and enjoy the enjoyment of a sinful life. Conversely, if you believe, and God exists, when you have to act in some way on the planet (perhaps not going to church or craving the neighbor's butt etc) Paradise More than the return of happiness. So, if God is unlikely to exist, you should believe

In this article I will interpret Pascal's bet as a unique fusion of theology and probability theory. Pascal believes that it is prudent to believe in the existence of God even if there is no evidence that God exists. The bet consists of the following simple parameters. I do not know if God exists or not. Therefore, we are faced with the choice of choosing whether to believe him or not. If you do not believe, we can live a life of your choice on earth, but there is a possibility that we may face an eternal curse. If we believe there is the possibility of abandoning secular happiness in the short term we can get a permanent remuneration after death. Based on his probability theory, Pascal's conclusion should obviously choose the latter. Potential rewards are unlimited, and positive losses are slight. (Masimimo)