Parody on Chaucer

Joe's book, the Canterbury story shows a frame story written at the end of the 14th century. It tells the story of a group of pilgrims who participated in the story and they entertain each other while visiting the St. Thomas Beckett temple in Canterbury cathedral. As a result, some stories are written in the imitative framework by exaggerating part of that aspect as a style imitating genres, usually intentionally to achieve comic effects , Especially attractive.

Therefore, the explanation of this story may nearly imitate Joe's appearance - it shows a silly thing of this masculine and chivalrous code. Or is Joe Rather mimicking this kind of romance - is this behavior recognized? In the first story, the problem of the future tone is in this story. Where did the cavalier's voice stop, Joe's beginning? Should I imitate this story, should I sit down in Joe's mouth or a knight? The dramatic nature of the story itself makes it easier to attribute them to a single single interpretation.

The Canterbury Tales, written by Geoffrey Chaucer at the end of the 14 th century, is deemed a satire of a gentleman, as it has in fact even criticized and imitated the main social classes of those days. Known as three mansions, churches, aristocrats and farmers, these courses have long represented the majority of the population. Prioress was based on her story based on a popular myth (see "blood" powerpoint slide). And it spread widely throughout Europe and involved members of Jewish believers. Jews are considered thirsty to kill revenge, kill innocent Christian children, and practice ceremonies with their blood. The source is Matthew's Gospel (27: 25), which is the foundation of the tradition of anti-Semitism in Europe that continues today. Blood was officially declared as a myth by the Pope Inocent IV in 1247, but Primores tells her story in a colorful and enthusiastic way.

Narrator's explanation is another example of humorous self-imitation in Joe's work. "The poet himself seems like a serious idiot" (Nevill Coghill). Chaucer asked him to explain to himself that he is not a minor qualitative character, not an explanation of flattery. This shows that Joe Cao wants to stay on "shadows". He did not want to be noticed, so I sat down and wanted to see squatting buried under others without paying attention. In this regard, Joe shows that even though the reader is getting entertainment from it, the narrator Joe is also the truth. The moderator said to the speaker: