Marjane Satrapi may argue that he is neither a historian nor a politician, but when we tell the truth, we add important parts to this puzzle, as well as describing and describing the moment of history. In culture, there is the power to divide both inside and outside threatening to tear the country, which truth can be dominated? Let's say you already know a mistake in a particular country or group of people. why? As long as you live there and not part of culture, you have only one snapshot. Satraphi explains how the novel wants to tell the truth about her truth about Iran and subdivided it into several stereotypes about becoming a country that is experiencing Iran, Muslims, and fundamentalist revolution .
We say "live the truth". This is not a fact. We all live in the same fact. And this fact is the simplest: we are happy, we are angry, we are scared, shy and indignant. You can not appear at the same time, right? So, every moment we are angry is our misfortune moment. Like Sir Sys ยท Bannon, this great truth also applies to you. But that is not that simple. You can try choosing it, just like a toothpaste on the shelf of Wal-Mart ... and for some reason, it's not like goods, collections, products, it just exists No. Your soul shelf does not seem to have it. Why can not you choose "happy" like "goods in a supermarket"? Where did it go?
Facebook has a realistic moment but I have not passed the test. It chooses to decide the truth that it is not true, each one of us has its own truth, or the truth is the truth. It is an editor who wants to be a world editor but proves to be an editor with a fuzzy and atypical value system that can not be classified, simply providing what they want to listen to and reinforcing existing beliefs It has been. In other words, our own personalized bubble matches our friendship, our environment, and our belief that some people have used it to achieve great success. We have four years now to think about the way we got here.