By insisting on complete orthodoxy, society only hurts itself. When society demands legitimacy, I think that it is looking for a problem. Orthodoxy can aid society a little, but when people need it, they ask that it is the most appropriate, it can only cause problems. There are many reasons why whey is completely orthodox just to harm society. First, it greatly weakens all forms of creativity and does not allow new ideas to contribute to society.
When I saw this movie at Sundance, my response to the movie was intense. It gives reality rather than the most orthodox orthodox views. I think that this is a common feature of all chic fundamentalist societies and is generally very attractive, but that is not concrete. Looking at the orthodox community working together as a community, I have five years of passionate memory about Lubavitchers. It is also reminiscent of the complete isolation of most "others" shared in these societies and its resulting bias. This is the ultimate "bubble" and there is no sympathy for the difference.
When it was first enacted, the most important ethical dilemma in orthodox society disappeared; choices were made between personal and social benefits. When everyone serves their own interests, the interests of society are automatically cherished. For outsiders, it seems like invisible hands, it can be said that they are talking to society as a whole. I used the word "competition" in my explanation. Without the complexity of the technical definition defined by economists for mathematical purposes, no one can change the price of the market in the competitive economy; everyone is the price recipient. Of course, this does not mean that the group does not lower the price despite the demand for low specificity items, which means that one person considers the current market price to be unchanged.