Organized complexity

There is no Rational Wiki without you. We are a small non-profit organization without employees - we are hundreds of volunteers who record fake science and hockey all over the world every day. We never allow advertisements as we have to be independent. We can not rely on major donors who have important issues correspondingly. We are not the biggest website, but we believe we play an important role in protecting truth and objectivity.

Abstract: The concept of "logical depth" proposed by Charles H. Bennett (1988) seems to at least partially capture the concept of systematic complexity. More precisely, the increase in organized complexity here refers to the wealth, diversity and complexity of the structure and should be confused with the random complexity increase formulated by Kolmogorov (1965) There is none. If Bennett suggested using "computational content" to absorb organized complexity, the fundamental cause of the increase in complexity in the universe is the existence and computation of a computer system with memory It is a cumulative creation and storage function of contents. In this view, the universe performs calculations, memorizes the calculations, and reuses them for further calculations. The evolutionary mechanism is a cumulative calculation of this form with memory and we owe the complexity of their organized life

In 1948, Warren Weaver proposed two forms of complexity: the complexity of chaos and the complexity of the organization. "Chaotic complexity" phenomena are handled using stochastic theory and statistical mechanics, but "organized complexity" avoids this method and "many factors related to each other simultaneously as organic as a whole" Including faced with. The 194 Weaver paper influenced later thinking about complexity. One problem with solving the problem of complexity is that there are many differences in formal random number sets and the number of relationships between elements in the system is large, when the constraints are in correlation It is an intuitive conceptual distinction between. ) Otherwise independent elements) Reduce the change in element independence and create more uniform or related relationships or interactions of the identifiable system

Organized complexity is the organization and complexity of the system. Patterns are simple, systems that are not systematized are more likely than complex structured systems. This system can be as simple as a crystal, it can be chaotic or complex like the weather, but it will still occur in a natural way. Even in this situation, it helps to avoid confusion with a simple system. Crystals get their simple structure through the interaction of intermolecular forces, and the complexity of the weather is due to the constant inflow of energy from the sun. If organization and complexity are not part of the same system, they obviously occur naturally, but if organizations and complexities are found in the same system, the likelihood of their occurrence is greatly reduced, The more systems you have, the less it will be. if possible. Such a system is less likely to be statistically generated by natural processes.