I will explain the two parts of the topic. One is the five power platforms commonly used in organizational politics. There are two categories that fall into two categories, official and personal. So what are the five power base and which is the best? We will examine these functions and compare them with our scenario. In the second part, we will introduce the relationship between dependence and power. Next, look at the scenario to see an example of these relationships. Two social psychologists, French and Crow, developed five power bases.
Resource dependence, political power and network method are the best connection theory as the core concept most commonly used in inter-organization network research. The core result variables are power / control, universality, success. Commonly affecting variables are critical and noncritical resources, dependencies, network locations, target consistency, and resource generosity. The process of linking with other network variables is motivation and intention. Generally, due to dependencies between various parts of the network, some models tend to observe to strengthen the capabilities and control of network companies in the network to profit for the success of the organization there is. Another important point is that there seems to be no clear consensus that the results and outcomes of certain forms of inter-organizational relationships may create research interest.
The organization relies on the structure to accomplish the task. This structure has politics and power, the foundation being to maintain an established order to achieve the organization's goals. Organizational structure is formed using power levels to maintain control - employment impact and incentives to allow employees to accept organizational goals, thereby creating key organizational functions, sales, transactions, revenue , And increase the profit gain in the business world and the financial world. The powerful use of personal power in politics of power supply organizations is subtly impersonated as it often benefits the organization through creative compromise. "Organizational politics is regarded as an art of creative compromise between competing interests" (Schermerhorn et al., 2005)