Opposing Viewpoints on The Lord´s Supper of Luther and Zwinglu

Luther discusses how other people can produce discussions on infinity based on natural reasoning. Luther did not ask how Christ can become God and man and how to integrate the two qualities of God and man into one. Luther cried that God is stronger than everyone's thoughts, and we have an obligation to obey his words. Luther also shouted that God transcends all arithmetic, and the word of God should be highly respected and admired.

The main theme of the early reform was the Lord 's supper. In 1529, Luther and Zwingli solved this problem. Though Luther broke the interpretation of the mass of Rome, he had a sacramental view of bread and wine that Zwingri had in his mind. Luther miraculously looked at Christ and gave it "in the form of elements, under the element" truly; Zwingli said that the Lord's Supper is only a sign or a symbol of a sacred saint. Jesus does not exist. This is just a monument. So, who is around Kevin: Luther and Zwingley? Answer: Both have both. He is somewhere in between by accepting the spiritual existence of Christ in spiritual dinner. Luther explained something as the body; Kevin saw spirituality in the believer's heart.

To Calvin, Luther taught the Lord's dinner. Changing bread and wine to the body and blood of Christ will allow Christ to appear in this sacrament (383 pages, Catechism of the Catholic Church) Luther teaches assimilation doctrine. In the question and answer, he defined the sacraments of the Lord's supper as "the true flesh and blood of our Jesus Christ under bread and wine, for Christian to eat and drink." "These words have been shown to us that" he continued "for his purpose. Luther said: "Even if the spell occupies or distributes the sacrament, he will accept Christ's true body and blood as if it were managed in the most valuable way, It is in words. "

The difference between Calvin and Luther is how Christ appears in the Lord's Supper. Calvin teaches that Jesus is not present, but exists in believers' minds through the work of the Holy Spirit. Luther taught that Christ still exists in bread and wine in a sense. Calvin also has a different view on how God's Kingdom works in today's world. Calvin puts more emphasis on how we should live in the grace of God, and Luther emphasizes the constant experience of this grace itself.