On U.S. Indian Policy

"The American Indian policy has always maintained the greatest sincerity against the Indians and they can not deprive them of their land and property from their land and property without their consent.Their property rights At freedom, they will never be attacked or interrupted. "Therefore, Thomas Jefferson briefly stated the US policy towards indigenous people and the proper grace of the Virginia gentleman. Jefferson's words seemed to have no ambiguity and contradiction, Jessin's remark seems to plant only the good intentions of Native American.

The driving force of the "Indian policy" in the United States: Indian policy in the United States from 1830 to 1830 is characterized by strengthening the government's paternalism, which is mainly reflected in the idea of ​​expansion and prosperity of the United States, the American Indian It can only be explosive in motion. Please check the political era. As a national ideology that continues to exist in several countries to date, the style of parents assumes that indigenous peoples are in the unexplored, backwards direction, requiring foreign guidance and guidance. - Rough appearance of the fur trading era in Indian territory, battle of Grizzly, drinking water, spinning of yarn, and image of frontier in the head. Barbarians are wild. In a sense, this image is a reality, but fur trading is not just a savage man. Fur trading is a business run by a merchant. Barbarians living in the border choose to trap

US - Indian policy - using constitutional powers under the guidance of Congress - an embarrassing way from the Indian autonomous law of 1790 to the alternate goal of 2000 According to the then European view, this policy suddenly "Civilized" tribes (1780s - 1820s), isolation and protection (1830s - 1870s), forced to assimilate to the American agricultural society. The relationship between the tribal government and the federal government (the 3030s to the 1940s) ended the status of trust (1950s) and finally supported the tribal self-determination and integrity (1960s - 2000). The early American policy from 1787 to 1830 seemed to protect the rights of India, but the Indian people suffered from a devastating shift to the ruthless west of the expansion of America, a devastating loss of land and life .

Naturally, the concept of tribal sovereignty and the legal challenge to Indian's monopoly federal authorities appeared soon. Strong supporters of national rights are trying to rule India's relationship. Therefore, the American Indian policy was further defined by the Supreme Court's three ground-breaking decisions between 1823 and 1832. Legendary Supreme Court Secretary John Marshall published three views related to the American Indian problem later called Marshall trilogy. These cases were Johnson v. Macintosh (1823), Cherokee National v. Georgia (1831), Worcester v. Georgia (1832), confirmed tribal rights to occupy and manage the land of India. US responsibility for tribal sovereignty and moral trust in tribes in national jurisdiction. Marshall stated that the tribe "depends on the state in the country," basically there is no state control.