On the Origin of Adaptations: Rethinking Fidelity Discourse and 'Success' -- Biologically

"The Origin of Adaptation: Reconsideration of Language of Loyalty and" Success "- Biology" by Gary R. Bortolotti and Linda Hutcheon suggests the use of fidelity as a clear habit to determine if adaptation succeeded I am criticizing. I failed. Bortolotti and Hutcheon use the field of evolutionary biology to propose a new evaluation system. In other words, the success of adaptation is judged by the efficiency in continuing the story. From an evolutionary point of view, adaptability depends on survival of the fittest - the strongest story is to adapt and adapt to the environment.

This review is one of a number of comments showing that the 1995 adaptation has succeeded as an opponent of Jane Austen's classic. Like this commentary, the Times newspaper in 1995 said: "Loyalty to original texts is wonderful - if changes or additions are made, it will expose the character, add humor to the situation, Many other comments suggest that the main reason for the review is not to judge adaptation based on their strengths but to compare TV films with original novels.

"The Origin of Adaptation: Reconsideration of Language of Loyalty and" Success "- Biology" by Gary R. Bortolotti and Linda Hutcheon suggests the use of fidelity as a clear habit to determine if adaptation succeeded I am criticizing. I failed. Bortolotti and Hutcheon use the field of evolutionary biology to propose a new evaluation system. In other words, the success of adaptation is judged by the efficiency in continuing the story. From an evolutionary point of view, adaptability depends on survival of the fittest - the strongest story is to adapt and adapt to the environment.

As literary and spiritually, it adapts adaptive discourse without doubt as adaptation of movie loyalty to its literary sources. '26 inevitably raises this problem in each case study afterwards and is of particular concern in the Daisy Miller study which reveals the limit of fidelity, especially from the viewpoint of filmmakers. . . Compliance with loyalty led to the suppression of potentially more valuable adaptation methods. It tends to ignore the concept of adaptation as an example of artistic fusion, perhaps even a satisfying and inevitable process in rich cultures; it differs from the need for more complex things, from fiction to movies Do not take seriously the transition of. It adapts to the content of the process; it ignores the production determinants that are not related to the novel but may have a strong influence on the movie.