Occupy Wall Street: An Inefficient Protest

In America, protest action has been used as a tool of change throughout history. Council raises concerns about issues that may be overlooked or ignored or may be done. The current nationwide protest action in our media is occupation of Wall Street (OWS) protest action. Wall Street protests and other professional protests were basically invalid protests. They did not succeed public support compared to the success of past anti-corruption behavior. There are many reasons for this.

Let's look at the case of Occupy Wall Street, mistakes in social movements, and comparison with Brazilian protests. Occupy Wall Street proposes several key ideals that the PAC can use to purchase parliamentary voting, government relief, and tax evasion / vulnerability to financial elite. First of all, these ideals are sufficient to cause protests, but it is much larger than the Brazilian passage protests. However, many people point out that OWS has failed. These ideas drifted, the problem areas and teams diversified too much, and the goal was blurred. In Brazil, federal traffic has wise maintenance goals. The idea of ​​talking equally throughout the organization further promoted OWS, as OWS has just gone too far from movement without a leader. As an equal voice group, they divide movement

September 17, 2011, as part of what was known as the occupation of Wall Street, hundreds of protestors gathered in New York. "The protesters met with the iconic Wall Street Bull statue at noon, discussed their goals and gathered at the People's Congress (Cnn Money) held at One Chase Manhattan Plaza at 3 pm. Concerned about the illegal acts of Wall Street executives and bankers due to the collapse of the US economy in 2008, the protest action gained international attention and laid the foundation for protest action. In this article, we will focus on the first "Occupation" protest in 2011 and the latest Democratic Spring protest action in 2016 from the viewpoint of responding to financial globalization. .