Obama vs. Romney: A Tale of Two Economic Plans

Mitromny and Barack Obama are two presidential candidates with very different economic positions regarding military, foreign policy, medical care, and national budget and tax. Each presidential candidate has his own reasons and beliefs as to why their economic policy is right and why they make the most of the economies of our great country. Although Barack Obama has won the presidential election in 2012, many believe that his economic plan still will not benefit our country, Romney may be better.

I know that. You are making a list of all presidential conflicts to refute to me. Let's take a look at other people: JFK v. Nixon, LBJ vs Goldwater, Humphrey & McGovern against Nixon, Carter against Ford, Clinton against Bush and Doll, Obama against McCain and Romney. These are competitions of men with similar intellectual identity. You can say that one person is smarter than others, but in these cases, Reagan, Bush 43, cards and their opponents are as big a gap as you see the election speech.

When Mitt Romney took part in the competition in 2012, I was very happy to discuss his idea with Obama's idea and the right friends. It is almost impossible to fast-forward for 4 years and make a reasonable conversation about the election. Everyone attacks their enemies of malicious ideology and refuses to listen to arguments contrary to their beliefs. Republicans received packages of racist label; Democrats were given package of socialist labels. Moderate Independent is accused of being weak and non-Americans

Mr. Obama's medical reform is a conservative idea. This is the idea of ​​the Heritage Foundation in the 1990s. This is their policy plan. This is the reason Mitt Romney first adopted. Mr. Barack Obama included Mr. Romney's plan nationwide because he believes he can give support from the conservative plan to the Republican Party. If they are not perfect barbarians, they should support the bill. Personally, I think privatization education, social welfare, criminal trial, etc. are purely stupid. In the long run, I do not think it will work. I do not think that profits from the service industry can meet human needs. This is counterproductive in terms of policy. But, if Obama's medical reform has received sufficient support from the beginning, is it effective?

Repeat the above survey in the 2012 elections, and if you search for "Mitromney" and "Barack Obama" in the 2012 headline, you can see that the 2012 election report is more balanced. (In 2008, there was not enough Facebook data to repeat this survey from the election cycle of Obama and McCain). Returning to the general election in 2016, one month before the president's debate began, I found that the report was consistently consistent. Scandal, support, and unresolved debate gathered the attention of social media that has never been before. In the weeks leading up to the third presidential debate, more than 30% of all content published by top media mentioned the name of Clinton or playing cards.