The last conclusion of Samuel Becket emphasizes the concept of existential philosophy. Existential philosophy emphasizes the isolation of individual experiences in the uninteresting universe. It emphasizes the unexplainable and meaningless nature of human beings and emphasizes free choice. In Europe in the 1960s, the rise of absurd theaters brought a conspiracy of existentialism. The final stage mostly reflects all aspects of existentialism. In this play, Samuel Becket provides a clear and redundant expression of human emptiness.
After Aristotle, let me tell you about nothing. This is not a unique and absolute condition. There is nothing meaning different in different contexts. From the perspective of life, nothing can mean death. For physicists this may mean that there is no substance or energy at all (it seems impossible), or even time and space does not exist. For a lover, it can not mean a lack of anyone I love. For parents, this may mean that there are no children. For painters, there is no color. We will provide readers with a world without books. Passion for those who are considerate, emotionally numb. For theologians and philosophers like Pascal, nothing means that only God knows infinite without the universe forever. When King Leah said to his daughter Coderia, "I will not do nothing anything", he said that she will be more than her, except she can express infinite love I mean it. Sisters get fewer kingdoms.
But, is this world really "nothing"? Even if it dies, everything becomes something. If my soul is made of energy, it will not be destroyed. I believe that nothing exists. Even if something is missing, everything is something. Am I also Zen? What if we were living like immortality? What if we treat others and nature as if they are always in front of them. Do not you think we want to convey sympathy to future generations? If you think about it and believe in reincarnation, next generation will also include you! This may be a very self-centered idea, but anyway, I think it makes sense.