Notes on a Lecture About DNA and Ethics

I participated in a lecture on chemical paper "Who is living my life?" Dr. David Magnus is speaking in this lecture. He is an assistant professor and graduate director of the Bioethics Center of the University of Pennsylvania. I learned that I can not understand my DNA and body. A question came up asking, "Do we have our own body?" And "Who is playing God in the 21st century?" Dr. Magnus asked us: "How many people in this room are saving my DNA somewhere in the US?" Only one person raised his hand and their DNA It was archived.

I would like to know more about what I wrote in a review article after the first lecture, which is the similarity between DNA and computer languages ​​- can we successfully reprogram our genes? I would like to know more about DNA and languages, but changing our diet and lifestyle will greatly improve our health. For me, writing a list of my passion is a good practice and useful; I learned my true passion - I was really surprised what I said. What I understood myself this week is that it is closer to people than I imagined. And I am more interested in people's way of thinking.

The second lecture is to talk about atheists as Christians. This is a wonderful speech, one of the best speeches throughout the meeting, and it is even more annoying. Looking back at the notes in this lecture, I do not know where to start. In stark contrast to "Jesus", this spokesperson repeatedly criticized "religion" which is one of my main temptations. (Even if I am an evangelist, I know that "This is not a religion, it is a relationship." For those who feel that their beliefs make them cool, that's just a pointless slogan The same applies to those who believe in Christ instead of "Christian." But the biggest problem I encountered is that this lecture gives an explanation of the little doctrinal question and the third belief in answers It is giving.

In his 1966 paper he pointed out that McGuinness mentioned his personal experience in cryptic terms in his "moral lecture" announced after his death in 1951 did. Among others, he feels "absolutely safe" and "in the hands of God". Among other people, he is surprised at survival and is considering a "world as a miracle". Analogy between experiences described by philosopher James. Schopenhauer, monk of the Catholic, Max Eckhart, and Muslim St. Archery. McGinnis also mentioned Olds Huxley, that perception door explains the mysterious experience caused by Mescalin. As I mentioned in my book "Rational Mysticism", Huxley and psychedelic people influenced me.