Notes from Underground: Binding Limits

In Dostoevsky's "underground memo", people in the basement had a hard time between the two faiths. It was by the author's behavior that first admitted that his imaginary existence was predetermined. The second person claimed that underground people celebrated free will and can live only in the pending world where they put them in mankind. For remedial measures, an underground man wanted to explore this duality and turned into writing, hoping not to reject truth, fear or not. Through this, he understands that his self-perception makes it impossible for him to control his behavior.

Underground memorandum (Russian before reform: Russian; reform Russian: tr.Zapískiizzodpól'ya) is also translated as an underground note or underground letter, written in 1864 by Fyodor Dostv. Many people think that the note is one of the earliest existing novels. It is an excerpt from an inexhaustible memoir of a retired civil servant living in St. Petersburg, itself a bitter, isolated, anonymous narrator (called a senior by a critic). The first part of the story is spoken in monologues or underground diaries. And it is an attack on emerging Western philosophy, especially "what is done" by Nicolas Chernishevsky. The second half of this book is called 'wet snow application', explaining some events that seem to be updating at times, destroying underground people who play narrator and anti hero who are unreliable on first person's name I am in

Notes from the ground can be divided into two different styles. The first one is an article and the other is a story style. The hero and the first-person talker is a 40-year-old public servant known as a man under the ground. The only known fact about his situation is that he withdrew from service, living in an underground apartment in the outskirts of St. Petersburg and funding his livelihoods through moderate inheritance . The first part is reflection on his society and his personality. He stated that he was malignant, dirty and ugly; the main focus of his controversy is his view of the "modern people" and the world, he attacks sternly and cynically, and attacks against him And revenge developed. He believes that his decline is natural and necessary. He emphasized that he did not intend to release his memo to the public, but the narrator repeatedly appealed to insufficiently informed audiences and tried to solve their problems.