Not All Offenders Should be Labeled Juvenile Delinquents

Do not point out that all offenders are juvenile delinquents as citizen's concerns. If a boy commits a crime or is accused of committing a crime, they will automatically become criminals, criminals and criminals from the eyes of the courts, the state and various people. However, I will mark them as fair. If an identity crime occurs such as curfew, vandalism, even illegal acts, that child should not be made illegal.

Young people should be tried as adults of the judicial system or bear the same punishment. The crime rate in the juvenile justice system was very low in the 1990s. Since the 1990s crime by young criminals has increased. According to the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Bureau data, a small number of young people are guilty of murder and estimated to have increased to 30%. "The Ministry of Justice estimates that it accounts for about 10% of all homicide.

In 1974, the Juvenile Judicial Crime Prevention Act was passed and it became an important milestone in the history of juvenile delinquency. Since the establishment of the Juvenile Court, this act was the most fundamental change in juvenile justice. The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act has five main points. First, it stipulates legalization to prevent status violators from being regarded as illegal. Second, it stipulates the institutionalization of juvenile correction so that only the most serious juvenile offenders are subject to imprisonment. In addition, the Act provides that status violators should not be institutionalized, and adult prison and juvenile boys should be separated by visual and auditory senses of adults. Third, we are expanding the use of change as an alternative to the formal handling of the Juvenile Court. Fourth, it continues to be applied to the minor's legal proceedings