Introduction "Life is suffering, survival is to find some meaning in suffering." A clear definition of the life and existence of Friedrich Nietzsche, the doctrine of suffering of Buddha, the meaning of suffering and its applicability to real life Complement each other. In essence, people must strive to achieve the root of pain and suffering, and finally the means to avoid it. Suffering can be physical or psychological, but it needs to produce the same result as the suffocating human experience. Pain may have many reasons, but it must arise from the following aspects: aspire to become, aspire to not become a perceptual experience.
Some say life is suffering. This is what the Buddha taught. But his teachings were lost in translation. On the west side, we made our life painful. When I taught that the Buddha suffers from life, he used the word Balik (Sanskrit) dukkha. Rather than withstand physical and emotional pain, dukkha means indefinite; life is short lived, instable, fleeting. At the moment we were born, the process of death began. Our body is shrinking. Our idea has declined. The thoughts and bodies of people we love follow the same process. When you tighten the handle, everything you touch will slide as though you are trying to catch water drops. But we continue to hold on. Almost all ideas are absorbed by what we are trying to grasp next. If we can use higher wages to get a better job. However, if you grab larger water drops, will water become less likely to adhere?
The essence of Buddha's teaching is that life is difficult and pain is inevitable. But suffering is optional. We suffer because of the unconscious custom of consciousness that has accumulated over the years, and we basically have to forget. More specifically, we respond to the desires and dislikes for external things (other things, things, money, ideas, etc.); b) develop ourselves and become "me", "me" "I" adhering to "(" Why are you going to me? "," This is my work "etc). For Buddha, the key to a happy life and a pure heart is to liberate itself from their desires and dislikes, to understand that self is a fantasy (not related to me). After removing enthusiasm and disgust, he is not the first person to say this. Priests had previously instructed students to be conscious of training not to respond to external things and to maintain equality, but it was always very theoretical and difficult to apply.
It is difficult to imagine what you can do, saying life is suffering. You have to spend time discussing with people who see more than just pain in life. Buddha himself said in one of his discourses. Brahmann named Long-nails (DÄ «ghanakha) came to him and announced that he would not approve anything. For the Buddha this will be a perfect moment, if he wishes he can join the truth that life suffered. Instead, he attacked the overall concept of whether life is worthy of approval. He said: (1) nothing deserves approval, (2) everything is so, (3) something is, something is not so. If you take one of these three positions, you will eventually argue with people taking two other positions. Where are you going?