Nicomachean Ethics: Friendship, Virtue and Happiness

In Aristotle's work seen in Aristotle's ethics, it is clear that Aristotle believes that friendship is necessary for a benign and happy life. Because the conditions necessary for perfect friendship and happy life are similar, I think this is accurate. It is also evident that friendship is useful for achieving a happy life, as friendship can make it easier to carry out benign behaviors. His explanation may have been misunderstood and in fact actual mistakes may occur, so we also want to understand all these effects of friendship on achieving a happy life These stupid It is necessary to discuss behavior.

In the philosophical debate about friendship, Nicomacian Ethics (Book VIII) usually continues to distinguish between three friendships: happiness, utility, and virtue. The way to understand these differences is a bit unclear, but the basic idea seems to be happiness, usability, and virtue. That is why we loved our friends in these various relationships. In other words, I may love my friends because of the way she helps me, or because I learned her happiness because I found she was benign. Given the involvement of love in all circumstances, it seems that all three friendships are not for yourself, but for your friends to care about your friends.

According to Nicole's ethics, Aristotle says we have three types of friendship; useful, fun, and perfect. In this article, I will explain why the happy friendship is the worst, and of course the perfect friendship is the best. "Now that people who love each other for their utility do not love one another for themselves, they have some good things about each other." (Nick. Human beings are historical This is a concept of a scholar of concern: "What is human nature?" This question may not be realized, it is not worth pursuing simply: exploring the human race problem in his tragedy "King Lear"