Neo-Colonialism versus Post-Colonial Theorisation

At the most basic level, the post-colony theory focuses on space, other space, and our space. As a Palestinian literary theorist, Edward Said - perhaps the most central person in post colonial thinking "," Because we are neither outside nor outside geography, we are completely free from the struggle of geography There is no "(1993, 6-7). Geographical struggle - this is a summary of the central content of post colonial thinking. Geographical graphics, descriptions of the earth are never neutral; they are written at a particular time, at a particular time, by a particular writer, for a particular audience, and so on.

I first analyze the new colonialism, study the situation of the African continent, and propose to show how the new colonialism is currently artificially maintaining poverty. Secondly, I suggest that indeed African unity itself can only be established by new colonialism that failed. I would like to first consider historically the neo-colonialism from the beginning, and then consider considering international monopoly.

What are the mechanisms and institutions that make up the new colonialism? Why are we talking about new colonialism rather than anti-colonialism? Is the structure, practice, concept of colonialism really different from the new colonialism? Is the difference between the new colonialism and colonialism beyond the theory? What kind of interest has been given about new colonialism / post colonialism? What is the relationship and continuity between colonialism and new colonialism? How do you deepen your understanding of our colony by discouraging ability and material interaction?

Colonialism of settlers is a world transcendental phenomenon as present and past. Since settler colonialism is rarely a tough form, there is no such thing as a new settlers colonialism or colonialism after the settlers. Not all immigrants are settlers; as Patrick Wolf points out, settlers will stay. They are the founder of the political order and they have their own sovereign capabilities. Settler's colonialism is not colonialism: settlers want indigenous peoples to disappear (but they can use their workforce before they disappear). Settlers in colonial form can sometimes work in colonial form, sometimes destroying them or replacing them. However, even though colonialism and settlers' colonialism have mutually penetrated and overlapped, they are still separated since they are mutually defined.

Colonialism of settlers can be distinguished from other forms of colonialism, including classicalism, international colonialism and new colonialism, through a series of important features. First, colonists settlers "stay": Unlike colonial rulers such as merchants, soldiers or governors, settlers shall collectively claim and claim sovereign permanently on indigenous lands Is intended. Second, colonial colonial invasion is a structure, not an event. Colonies colonialism continues to eliminate indigenous peoples and asserts state sovereignty and judicial control over the country. Despite the post-colonial concept, settler colonial society will not stop colonization