Negative and positive writing

Before the mobile language emerged, Web of Language was my favorite language related blog. Now, this is my second favorite ... a few days ago, an English professor at the University of Illinois, blogger Dennis Barron wrote an article about psychological experiments. It obviously indicates that the writer feels worse than the author. Please feel more active and effective writer. I do not want to add Professor Baron's idea on how to cause denial to the writer. Joe Forgas, professor of psychology at the University of New South Wales, seems to have some limitations on human emotions: "negative emotions", "neutral emotions", "positive emotions", a bit , Presto, emotions of the entire writer. What happens to the nuance? Is the sad writer the same as a clinical depression writer? Is it somewhat sad for my blog writing or should I write more useful from the depth of despair?

It was one of the tragic effects of some form of English management - as Don Watson pointed eloquently in the death penalty, it took life out of the language. If 'negative', 'neutral' and 'positive' reflect the complexity of 'emotion', what do you think about psychology and other fields? On a recent flight to Australia, the crew said that anyone who "feels uncomfortable" to us should report to the cabin crew. After sitting in the same uncomfortable place for 14 hours, I felt very uncomfortable, but I was convinced that everyone of the airplane felt "uncomfortable" as well. after that. But my first two coughs and 14 hour sneeze were not reported - I can not blame him: if there is no other person, other passengers obviously 'uncomfortable', foot swelling , Stomach discomfort, shoulder stiffness etc. They should report their "discomfort", why should you report him?

All of these lead to problems. Those who wrote the presentation (I have read it clearly before, but I have heard it before) So are many writers suffering from poor vocabulary?

In this comparison, we compare the positive lighting condition and the negative lighting condition of positive emotions. The results of this analysis were not significant (p = .50). In the second comparison, we compare the negative lighting condition with the neutral lighting condition of positive emotions. The results of this analysis were significant (p = 0.004) and showed that participants under negative conditions reported greater positive emotions from pre-test to post-test than under control conditions ing. In the third comparison, we compare positive lighting conditions and neutral lighting conditions for positive emotions. The results of this analysis were significant (p = 0.000), indicating that participants with positive conditions reported positive emotions from positive to positive compared to control conditions from pretest to posttest. Difference in satisfaction of life. The result of this analysis is not significant, F (2, 40) .24, p = .79

Discussions on hypotheses related to positive emotions are partly supported in particular by participants' emotional experiences. Both positive and negative writing conditions report more control conditions in positive sentiment from pre-test to post-test. Considering the large amount of literature supporting the description of the benefits of stress experience, this finding is not surprising (eg Park & ​​Blumberg, 2002; Pennebaker et al., 1990). This is the first study we have reached so far to achieve such a result by using positive writing conditions. Three days after the test there was no significant difference between positive and negative conditions in positive emotions. This discovery means that both types of writing tasks (positive or negative) are equal.