Nature vs Nurture: Do Genes Or Environment Matter More?

Since I remember that, I am interested in human research. I have been observing many cultures for many years. Based on studies of thousands of years on my human culture, humans may not have the opportunity to advance without beliefs, morals, and possibilities to learn new ideas from others. In the era of primitive needs and instincts, mankind does not have the thought, religion, and morality human beings have today. In the past thousands of years, humans learn to react with each other to learn new ways to create new ways of life, because human beings succeed in the process of religious learning, and medical progress of the human body may not be so I do not.

For psychologists who studied the development of persons with individuality decades ago, "nature and cultivation" is a central argument. "Nature and cultivation" suggests that biology (human genes) and society (human growing environment) are the power of competitive development, suggesting that one person may be more important than others It is (Eaves 43). We now know that both are necessary for normal development. Both will help us to make it real. In order to investigate how genetics and the environment affect humanity, psychologists look to research fields called behavioral genetics (Allen 99). By observing the behavior within the individual group, psychologists try to determine the proportion related to genetic differences and the proportion related to environmental differences

The cultivation of nature and human behavior and characteristics depends on whether it is natural or cultivated, but this is a remarkable problem. If a person's behavior is inherited directly from its parent's genes or other biological factors, the character of the person's character is natural. But if the growing environment affects his behavior, that is to decide the cultivation of his / her personality. It has become the focus of controversy among scientists, psychologists and sociologists

Complex interactions between genes and the environment can also explain the fact that the intellectual heritage rate increases during the life cycle. The mature discovery of 61 is the result of society in which various cognitive activities available in occupational and private life are more active in adults than in children in choosing a specific environment suitable for their genes. People who find their niche markets can improve their abilities with careful learning.