Natural Selection and The Design Argument

Design theory is very similar to "cosmology" in that it attempts to infer the existence of God, but it is not from the existence of the universe, but rather from certain aspects or features of the world, ie order, regularity and purpose I come from the existence of. Order, regularity, purpose is regarded as an indication of design, the conclusion of the argument is that God must be the source of design. There are various kinds of design theory, philosophers give them different names, but the two most famous ones are "design theory" and "design theory".

Charles Darwin uses the concept of "natural selection" to challenge the design controversy. This is the theory which claims that species evolve and evolve over time as the most powerful and adapted species survive. Darwin believes that the illusion of design is actually not the god as a designer but the result of a natural and random process caused by natural selection. Steve Jones expresses the process as "the success of a series of failures", which also challenges the design of participation in divine seeds.

Regarding Lahti, who claimed that Darwinist claimed that "the natural world was designed," the commonly used design refers to intelligent design. Of course, the Darwinists believe that the Earth is "designed" through natural selection. And choose mutations and genetic diversity that maximize the success of survival and breeding. In fact, using the expression "natural design" "design" is like an "artist" blowing the wind around the paint. The phrase "The world is designed by mutation (copy error)" contains many inconsistent ideas. In addition, contrary to Lahti's statement, biologists have mentioned much about the purpose and agents of this design in metaphysical terms.

Natural selection explains the "design" of living organisms, as adaptive changes tend to survive and propagate the potential of their vectors at the expense of mismatch or poor adaptive changes. As evolution is not dominated by random mutations, the point of view of intelligent design advocates is to point out incredibly impossible things about opportunistic events (such as mutations) to explain the adaptation of living things There. Instead, there is a natural process (ie, natural selection) that is not random, but that can create order. Features acquired by organisms in evolutionary history are not coincidental, but are determined by their functional usefulness. Creatures designed to meet their living needs

In order to further understand the dilemma between intelligent design and natural selection, we need to further explore the concept of natural selection. Natural selection is a process to be carried out for the next generation. It is a selective form of species, as it is the first phenomenon discovered by Charles Darwin, which is important for the existence of species and the cause of evolution. In other words, or as described in Wikipedia, "The basic concept of natural selection is based on an individual (adaptive trait) whose physical and biological environment (" nature ") has improved survival and / . In this theory, it is thought that by adaptive evolution by natural selection, the population will change ecologically and will continue to change until becoming a different species.