natural rights

Since the ancient Greek era, political theorists have always insisted on the existence of natural rights. It means the right of the natural (or god) gift that people had before the government was formed. It is widely believed that these rights belong to all men at birth and can not be deprived.

The concept of natural rights was one of the most powerful arguments among British John Rock (1632-1704) writings. And they believed that people were born in a natural state, tolerance and happiness. In this primitive presence, that person has the right to life, liberty and property.

However, everyone chooses to live within the scope of nature's law, not threatening the freedom of others. At this stage, people signed a social contract (contract). And it formed the state (government) to protect the members' rights of society.

Locke believes that the only reason the government exists is to protect natural rights, thereby expanding human happiness and safety.

Many American settlers accepted these views enthusiastically in the 18th century, a time when political philosophy was widely read and discussed. James Otis appealed spontaneously to natural rights in the claim against the aid warrant of 1761 and Thomas Jefferson proposed a classic paraphrase with the 1776 independence declaration.

When the classic study of the text of the Declaration of Independence by Carl Becker first appeared in 1922, it showed a big departure from the "passport".

More than the concept of natural rights. John Rock and its predecessor Hugo Grotius are often admired as introducing the concept of contemporary natural rights. Historically, it seems that the doctrine of natural rights has developed or at least matched it within the traditional framework of natural law. Whether the concept of natural rights is based on the concept of natural law, the concept of natural law comes from the concept of natural rights, or are they separately developed but related concepts? In any case, natural law and natural rights are compatible ideas, each of which is rooted in the essence of human beings, both of which require an existential foundation. Natural law and natural rights are based on epistemological realism.

Currently, the concept of natural law is closely related to the concept of natural rights. In fact, many philosophers, law scholars, scholars are synonymous with natural rights (Latin: natural rights) or natural justice using natural law. Others distinguish between natural law and natural rights. Due to the intersection of natural law and natural rights, the natural law has been cited as an integral part of the American Declaration of Independence, so it is claimed in the Constitution of the Natural Law and the French "Free Law" declaration. The rights of people and citizens (1789)

Natural rights - natural rights are usually related to natural law. For many thinkers, the right of nature is the assertion or the right we have with a reasonable existence. We can have natural rights to do or possess something, such as the right to protect our lives. Rousseau believes that the problem of this definition is that it emphasizes the role of the reason. It may be the latest development. Rousseau, on the other hand, established the concept of natural rights to the principles of compassion and self-protection, arguing that this principle existed before reasonable. One of the objectives of Rousseau's reconstruction is to show that the concept of natural rights is possible before mankind becomes society and establish a political regime, so he states that the state of nature is some people It is not a terrible place suggested by. . Mercy, self-protection, and see the laws of nature