Narrative Tensions: The Archive and the Eyewitness

There is a fundamental tension between the witness's testimony and the record of the record (I gathered the attention of many artists and intellectuals during the past 10 or 2 years). Archive materials have bureaucratic traces that are stored in the system. Past evidence is recorded but not yet processed; it exists as a mnemonic device, waiting for researcher arrival to become activated. On the other hand, the story of the witness is very personal, even if it is collective. The opposite between these two expressions and the memories themselves has a long history. In Plato's pharmacy, Jack Derrida stepped up the relationship between memory and remembrance between the truth of life and the archive. Recently, Giorgio Agamben analyzed the memorable "memorable" memory and remembered memories and archives and wrote a new article about the Berlin monument to the murdered Jews in Berlin.

In this article we will explore various methods such as life and death, individual and public, fragment and whole, individual and system, autobiography and history, dynamic relationship between notification and complexity. - Witness narration and files. The focus of discussion was at the Hohenschaenhausen Memorial to the victims of the former Old Quest Center and the former Stati's East Germans where the prison was located, and the headquarters of the Stashi Museum of Art in the former location. Archive Miles

Witness testimony The testimony of a witness is defined as "the field of research to study the precision of memory after an accident, crime, other major incident, and the type of common mistake in such situations". Inaccurate eyewitness testimonies can lead to serious consequences leading to false beliefs. Witness testimony is a powerful tool in every field. Especially ... the accuracy of witness and testimony is widely debated. People are seeking themselves, especially the memory of infants aged 5 to 10 years is accurate and also reliable. So, can the child's memory and testimony be accurate? A lot of research was done to answer this question. Most studies, unfortunately, show that we can not rely on their precise memory in testimony. I have to say I agree

There is a fundamental tension between the witness's testimony and the record of the record (I gathered the attention of many artists and intellectuals during the past 10 or 2 years). Archive materials have bureaucratic traces that are stored in the system. Past evidence is recorded but not yet processed; it exists as a mnemonic device, waiting for researcher arrival to become activated. On the other hand, the story of the witness is very personal, even if it is collective. The opposite between these two expressions and the memories themselves has a long history. At Plato's pharmacy, Jack Derrida gradually dismantled the relationship between memory, regeneration and memory, the truth of life and the archive.