Gandhi is best known for formalities and experiments that focus on Ahilsa and other absolute nonviolence and love. As I pointed out, nonviolence and violence, and love and hatred have very broad and profound meanings. It is clear from the current multidimensional form and structure. Peace education must analyze how we socialize, educate, realize life and non-violence, and the reality of love violently. For peace education in Gandhi, satya and ahiṁsā must be made complete, dialectical, interactive, and enhanced relations. While ahiṁsā is the means, in most cases Gandhi will take satya as the end. As mentioned earlier, we can not use violent means to achieve moral and spiritual goals. In purpose analysis, unethical violent measures lead to immoral violence. However, Gandhi also proposed a major ontological argument beyond this moral analysis.
Our seminar reflects theoretical analysis and practical experience of nonviolent and nonviolent behavior (starting with Henry David Thoreau and Mohandas Gandhi, leading to today's example). We included the nonviolent anarchist approach at Augusto Boal's depressed theater and reflection on Gene Sharp's nonviolent strategy. Our team believes it is possible to eliminate inequality, discrimination, thereby eliminating violence and developing non-violent behavior and methods for social and political change. Therefore, based on the principle that "Nonviolence is not a hope of achieving in the future, but is a means to achieve this goal", our group is based on daily life habits considered "neutral" I raised a question. Our team has been learning, practicing and teaching means and methods of nonviolence for more than a decade, but this is the way of thinking of life, and now we develop as a life principle.