NAFTA: Not for America

The US economy is not noteworthy. We are unemployed and income is increasing. One in seven citizens has received financial support, and our government needs to do some statistical work. The first step to recovery is to abolish the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement or the North American Free Trade Agreement. This is because of the stability of our economy and danger for the future. The North American Free Trade Agreement came into effect on January 1, 1994, and on January 1, 2008 all quotas and tariffs were abolished. This agreement aims to expand trade between Canada, Mexico and the United States by relaxing tariff regulations and encouraging foreign direct investment. In developing countries.

The promulgation of the North American Free Trade Agreement indicates that the United States has entered the era of globalization and neoliberalism. Previous social contracts and ideological paradigms have never been negotiated in the North American general market and we have not thought about producing the world's cars in some countries. The World Trade Organization (WTO) held in Seattle in 1999 proposed to accept China with no workers' rights and almost no environmental regulations, and environmental protection activists and labor union activists united to 40,000 people Destroyed the city. The WTO meeting failed, but China was accepted two years later. After the North American Free Trade Agreement and the World Trade Organization expanded to include China, the US foreign trade will grow exponentially, but after a short boom in the 1990s workers' wages and American living standards It did not rise so much.

Is NAFTA good or bad? What are the advantages of the North American Free Trade Agreement? North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is an important part of North American international trade. The North American Free Trade Agreement was established based on a trade agreement between the United States and Canada in 1989. This is responsible for cut tariffs between countries. Factories in the United States are concerned about unemployment when the factory is moved abroad, and US companies may use cheap labor and lack the rights of workers. Furthermore, environmental protection organizations are concerned that it will become difficult to enforce the pollution law in countries where the environmental law is loose.

This political and economic initiative was institutionalized in North America in 1994 by the North American Free Trade Agreement and institutionalized in other parts of the Americas through a series of similar agreements. However, at the 4th American Summit in 2005, most South American countries rejected the inter-American comprehensive free trade area project. Since the 2000s, the Left Party has held power in most countries.

In recent years representatives from 34 countries have expanded the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to Central America, South America, and Caribbean countries. The American Free Trade Area (FTAA) is another example of free market fundamentalism that creates global competition that threatens the environment, family livelihoods, human rights, and democracy. Again, a comprehensive "free trade" agreement has been developed to prioritize commercial interests over all other values.