Imagine you just had your first daughter. From the moment you look at her, you are overwhelmed with joy and happiness. She grew up like a curious, fun, ordinary child. However, one day, she changed, it is no longer full of vitality, vitality. Then you will find her scratched on her back and take her to the hospital. The doctor there observed her low white blood cell count and suggested that you treat the oncologist as a precautionary measure. The diagnosis you got is what you did not expect and she is leukemia.
The movie 'Guardian of my sister' is a movie depicting a couple who decided to give birth to a designer's baby to save the eldest daughter of leukemia. This movie continues to show that the Savior's children are asked to accept various invasive procedures to help brothers and sisters and to donate her kidneys to save her life I will. If this happens in real life, it is just unfair for the Savior's children. Even if the child chooses to refuse, he must imagine the emotional trauma that he must experience. It is incorrect to bring children to the world and bring such a heavy burden to him or her.
Two books by Jodi Picoult - a guardian of my older sister (with a movie) and her book - were reading, so I began writing the way of thinking of that book. Because it is my book, it is very unstable. Deeply, there are emotional drips on every page. But when I read this book, I did not cry. I'm just mad. I am very angry about the fact that racial discrimination exists and once existed. PLOT: There is a hospital's best African-American labor nurse, and a white supremacist couple sends their first kid. She was assigned to them, but they disliked the black people, so they asked her for change. Of course she was angry, but she left. Due to the unexpected situation, she left the child again.
Several critics have directly dismissed my son 's guardian. Meredith Bloom of the New York Times Book Review considers this book "an opera as a drama", and it is described as "a combination of science fiction and lifelong channel movies". However, most critics agree with the view pointed out in the Cocos Review: "The author vividly evokes the physical and mental damage that very sick children have on their families." Personal autonomy And when talking about conflicting rights of brothers and sisters, there is no easy result, but Picoult hindered our expectations in an unexpected way. "