My Response to Jeremy Rifkin's "A Change of Heart about Animals"

Jeremy Rifkin pointed out in the article "Changes in the minds of animals", which seems unbelievable, but many of our similar creatures resemble us in many ways. For example, in a movie called Poly, a young girl with autism is attached by a parrot. The girl is difficult to talk but I can not. As time passed, the parrot helped her and the girl began talking. One thing happened, the little girl's parents decided to let the parrot leave. The parrot finally entered the animal laboratory, but somehow he ran away.

Introduction: In an article on "Animal Heart" published in the Los Angeles Times editorial in 2003, Jeremy Rifkin believes that new research raises questions about common beliefs between humans and other animals. There are many boundaries that exist. Therefore, he suggested that humans should expand their sympathy for animals and treat them better. To support this view, Rifkin notes that research allows animals to master languages, use tools, express self recognition, predict death, and convey knowledge from one generation to the next He pointed out. Rifkin's claims provide an urgent need for human empathy to expand, "including a wider range of biological groups" (Rifkin 16). However, the logical extension of the discussion of Rifkin requires that humans anthropomorphize all the features of animal human emotions in ways not supported by similar studies.

Jeremy Rifkin said that animals possess the same human qualities as human beings in "Changes in the minds of animals". This makes them more suitable, if not the same respect as human beings. He cited many examples of specific animals such as human emotions and proficiency. I do not agree with Rifkin. I believe that most animals should not be respected more than humans, as most of the animals that he cites are killed and used for reasonable human use. First, Rifkin provided many contradictory examples of what he tried to argue. The first Rifkin says "The social behavior of pigs subsidized by Purdue University McDonald ... ... they are enthusiastic about emotion and they are easily frustrated when they are isolated ... Mr. Rifkin, Pig said that attention is required to maintain health

Mr. Jeremy Rifkin, a prominent writer and weapon political analyst, wrote as follows. Rifken). Rifkin proved that pigs have emotions and may be as depressed as people. They are still just animals, just because pigs have certain human characteristics that do not make them humans. "If the assailant is undergoing previous animal cruelty, only some felony is tolerated by some state laws Please consider that only a few animal cruel cases are reported or prosecuted Confirmed received."