My Origins

It all began about 30 years ago when a young woman went to see a doctor with her first son, Peter. Her husband passed away in war almost two years ago. The child was so ill that she decided to go to the hospital. Experts could not help when she got there. Until the doctor's name, Mr. Jonathas met her. He liberally looked after the baby and gave her a big discount. She is happy at home. The next morning she went to see the doctor again. As a symbol of Thanksgiving, she gave him a beautiful basket full of fruits.

This is the follow up of my first article on Calexit. If you are interested, you can read it here. My original is an official guide on why Calexit was published and its way, at least according to supporters it is legally rational and politically necessary. In this article, I will clarify and clarify many of my previous views based on the responses and questions received when replying to the original paper. My position on Calexit's idea is clear. It is a terrible idea of ​​replacing hatred with another form of hatred. This is not only because I think that this idea is wrong. This is the whole legal premise that the advocate has raised about why Calexit is necessary and necessary and shows the lack of knowledge about the most basic elements of law, politics and history. I can say this: if students use the so-called Blue Book as research papers, I will give it F. I have no choice.

Disclaimer: I am not a professional writer. My thoughts and conclusions are sometimes not the best research. In my opinion, the iterative idea is my "original idea" made without consciousness of the origin of "original idea", but this does not mean I have not reached the same conclusion. My grammar is not the best, but please do not distract me (English is my second language ... but this is my best language, please do not post comments)