More on Citizens United: Recommended Reading, Policy Updates

In the four years since the citizen federation dominated, we learned a lot. Our data tracks the two major election cycles since then and this ruling has contributed to the surge in external expenditure, as we stated earlier this week. When we noticed the influence of that decision and realized that it was only one of the many places that forms the campaign fiscal law, we read the reading list of citizen co-proposals - research thesis, news articles, books, And some of what we wrote There is no special sequence for blog project to determine the result. For more information on our resources, please visit Citizen United's report page.

"The selling country: conservative millionaires dominate North Carolina, one of the most important battlefields of 2012" (Jane Mayer, The New Yorker, 10th October 2011)

"Defend the citizen solidarity: Why does the fiscal reform campaign threaten American democracy?" (R. Glenn Hubbard and Tim Kane, Diplomacy, July / August 2013)

"The situation of campaign fiscal policy: recent developments and challenges in Congress" (R. Sam Garrett, Congress Research Service, April 29, 2011)

Shadow Magic: Five easy steps that will play an important role in politicians, allowing your donors to conceal and play IRS (Robert Maguire and Viveca Novak, Open Secrets.org, 2013 4 Moon)

Corporate Disclosure Rules of the US Securities and Exchange Commission - The Securities and Exchange Commission sets rules that require publicly listed companies to disclose the use of corporate funds for political contributions and activities to shareholders.

"The US Securities and Exchange Commission will remove the disclosure of political expenditure from the agenda of 2014" (Alex Baumgart, OpenSecrets blog, December 3, 2013): "The new rules the Securities and Exchange Commission will consider next year The US Securities and Exchange Commission is reluctant to adopt this approach in 2014 and this is essential for maintaining the health of American democracy Blow to transparency is.

"Make a wish! Request a corporate political gift to be two" (Miriam Diemer, OpenSecrets blog, August 2, 2013)

US Internal Revenue Service guidance on tax-exempt social welfare organizations on political activities related to candidates - The State Administration of Taxation introduced a new regulation on 501 (c) (4) social welfare organizations, We are restricting participation.

FCC Ad Disclosure Rules - The Federal Communications Commission may request more detailed and accurate broadcast disclosure in order to show who is funding political advertisements.

"Cruz voted for FCC Chair on political disclosure" (Todd Shields and Laura Litvan, Bloomberg Business Week, 17th October 2013)

In the face of the newly discovered conflicting attitude of Congress against political transparency, Congress did not take action to update the Federal Disclosure Act to cover the new expenditure permitted by the Citizen Federation. We are facing increasing expenditure, especially for state and local races. In response to the citizen association, the state updated and expanded its disclosure requirements and enforcement; California, 85 Delaware, 86 Massachusetts, 87 Maryland, 88 Hawaii, 89 Vermont 90 and North Carolina 91 each passed a new pass We passed the disclosure method 92

As part of AGU's latest policy, in 2018 we created a new honor and governance disclosure process. Governance positions and candidates for the honor of AGU or other recognized candidates are currently required to disclose formal complaints about professional conduct. This disclosure is similar to self-disclosure of conflicts of interest necessary for activities of the same AGU. In addition, as the AGU's scientific integrity and ethics policy changes, the Board of Directors is required to share an annual report on AGU ethical complaints, including information on all formal complaints submitted to AGU We issued a new directive of. The calendar year, the number of ethical litigation dealt with, their current position, and the confidentiality of all parties. This report details the scientific integrity of AGU and the new development and partnership of vocational ethics activities in detail.