Morality And Power

The history of Thucydides' Mytilenian debate and Melian dialogue reflects the reality of moral dependence on the period of power exercise and the exercise period of power. The theme going through these two arguments is that those who have the ability to act according to their wishes have the right to decide morality. The argument for determining the fate of Mychiren is not strictly based on morality but their power is based on the way they allow them to exercise the moral path of their choice.

There is no doubt that the force is dangerous. But powerless morality is meaningless. This is what Friedrich Nietzsche called "the morality of slavery". In other words, they think that the morality of unprivileged people, the lack of their power will make them better, and those who own and control power are not well defined. Nietzsche compares it with "dominant morality" that emphasizes courage, value creation, and value of life. As I already quote Nietzsche, I believe that some of those readings immediately condemn me as an encryption fascist. Let's pause so that they can rush to social media and cause social exclusion.

In a moral strain Nietzsche interprets morality as a system designed to tame human animals. The purpose of ethics is to eliminate the instinctive creativity of animals and to build a life in the bondage of asceticism. These "ideals" are all values ​​and ideologies that are brought about by protecting humanity from the dangers of nihilism, which is a state where humans can not answer their existence. Morality firmly holds the protection of the species 'human'; morality stubbornly denies the possibility of a human being who opens the future. When Nietzsche 's philosophical anthropology is summarized in a few words, for Nietzsche, it will be said that it is necessary to try to regard the human being as a sort of self - ending and as a simple means. Perfect, complete, happy, powerful, and victorious, this is still scary! "(Nietzsche 2007: 25)

At Nietzsche 's autobiography "Ecce Homo", he pointed out that his morality acquired his impulse. One of them is as follows. Sympathy of sympathy - This part is for strength, Partial His humanity is more self-centered: this is "permanent self-conquest". This is his moral view. Personal ethics Nietzsche is an avid individualist. Unfortunately, it has not been strengthened - whether it is Pittier or Pitti. In summary, we need to remember the problems that Nietzsche is solving. His work is for his disciples, his followers, and he acknowledges that they are few and between them. In this case, he is not upset and he is stubborn to a poor position. But he wrote a letter to The Strong. Therefore, in this context Nietzsche tells his followers about those who are not - not strong people: