The ability to rationally make judgments and make correct decisions for centuries has been controversial. Through this rationalization, regulations governing ethics or the ability to judge good and evil of people begin to develop. For some people, these ethics are predicted by the existence of God and are determined in advance, but other people derive morality from other means. Because Charles Darwin and Ralph Waldo Emerson could not gain moral sense from religion, they developed their own new ideas and gained morality from them, even if they are very different Even if.
The result of the claim that the morality of the act is judged completely by the result. This is an important requirement. Think about it: How do you judge how you are right or wrong? Some people say that they intentionally make judgments, others judge by action. If you judge by action, why is that behavior moral or immoral? According to resultant, the result of action. In other words, the final proof is correct. But how do you judge whether the result itself is good or bad, moral or immoral? Oh, for this, we will have to go a little deeper.
Moral absoluteism believes that there is an absolute standard for judging moral issues - whether an action is right or wrong. It is contrary to moral relativism, that is, there is no universal moral principle - they are culturally defined. Religion is a perfect example of doctrinal-based tension, as the word "like Romans in Rome" continues. Religion is about the dignity of life and fulfilling our purpose as a human being. Focus on commonality. What is the purpose behind your religious beliefs? We accept that we can share the same goal even if others have different beliefs
Most religious positions are based on the Ten Commandments and God's orders. It is a perfect example of moral absoluteism. The morality of behavior is judged based on the immutable position. Most secular philosophy is also an example of moral absoluteism, as it points out that moral absolute law is inherent in human nature. Moral absoluteism is very popular among the ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. It also shaped most of the historical society by "King of the King". The sacred right of the King confer the king's political and religious rights as they are approved by God. Rulers are only God's will, they are not what they serve. This has been extended to the establishment of legal and judicial systems all over the world and we must comply with the law without exception.