Moral Philosophy

Moral philosophy is a field of philosophy that considers good and evil. It explores the nature of morals and explores how people should live with others.

"Moral things", "What is justice", "What is the truth?", "How can we prove that my belief is superior to beliefs contradicted by others?"

Another division of moral philosophy is normative ethics. That answers the question about what we have to do. Normative ethics is focused on providing a framework for deciding what is right or wrong. The three common frameworks are morality, utilitarianism, morality

The last branch is an ethical application. It includes specific practical matters of moral importance such as war and death penalty. Application ethics also addresses the specific ethical challenges people face everyday, such as whether to deceive friends and colleagues.

Therefore, regardless of whether our moral focus lies in global picture problems, actual frameworks, or whether it applies to a particular dilemma, moral philosophy is necessary for us to examine and live in ethical lives You can provide tools.

Experimental moral philosophy emerged as a methodology of the last decade of the 20th century as a division of a larger experimental philosophy (X-Phi) approach. Experimental moral philosophy is an empirical study of moral intuition, judgment and behavior. Like other types of experimental philosophy, it involves using experimental methods to collect data and use it to confirm, destroy, or modify philosophical theory. In this case, the theory under consideration includes the nature of moral reasoning and judgment, the extent and source of moral obligation, the kindness of mankind and good life, and even the extent and nature of the moral theory itself . This article begins with a brief introduction to the historical usage of empirical data in moral theory and then continues to ask about the identity of experimental moral philosophy.

First let me say that morals are practical. Moral philosophy will be the philosophy of this practice. What I want to say is that the importance of moral philosophy is not the reason for taking action before acting but to understand the moral reflection after action. This is bold paper. If it is correct, it will bring a special dark shadow to the current practice of western academic philosophy. It turns out that it is itself the correct way to kart the cart problem, "correct manufacturing characteristics", or cars. In other words, we are completely addicted to positive morality and tend to decide what is right in a series of circumstances. I would like to suggest that the correct role of moral philosophy is so to speak.