Moral Philosophy as Applied Science by Ruse and Wilson

As a moral philosophy of applied science, Rousse and Wilson cite "moral philosophy as applied science" as an example of brothers and sisters' incest avoidance. People who avoid sex have an adaptive advantage. Their brothers and sisters.

Recently E. O. Wilson and scientific philosopher Michael Ruse (1940-) proposed a new moral theory. They refuse the theory that nature claims to prove value as a change of evolution. Because of lack of biological basis, they rejected Julian Huxley's theory. On the contrary, Wilson and Ruth established a relationship between morality and evolution without admitting the error of naturalism. (The idea or value you can get from.) They start with two scientific premises: 1) Social behavior of animals is controlled by genes; 2) Humans are animals. Since these two premises are true, we have chosen the unique biological human morality based on the choice of relatives.

Rousseau and Wilson cited an example of brothers and sisters' incest avoidance in "moral philosophy as applied science" which is a moral code guided by epigenetic rules to avoid sexual intercourse with brothers and sisters. Benefits In this discussion, Rousseau and Wilson believe that ban on incest is a redundant relic of human evolutionary history, but they do not contribute to humanity but rather explain the characteristics of hardwired evolution To do. I refuse this argument. Rousseau and Wilson are definitely right, they believe that human moral reasoning ability is the result of pressure of natural selection, and most ancient moral law has evolutionary grounds. Provide content on current moral beliefs

In their article, Wilson and Ruse argue that evolutionary biology provides a solution to the Is-Ought problem. Contrary to the assertion that moral truth is independent of human nature and human nature, they claim to have "internal moral premise" to rely on "a unique program that started in the brain during evolution" To do. These internal concepts and plans create "strong enough to function as the basis of ethics principle" "right and wrong feelings". By understanding the brains deeply, in the end it will be possible to build a "permanent code" that we can not explain now.