Moral Panic

Moral panic Moral panic is a concept that is widely used in social science and is often misunderstood. This word was invented by British sociologist Stanley Cohen in the late 1960 's. Cohen defines moral panic as a form of collective behavior. Meanwhile, "the situation, plot, appearance of an individual or group is defined as a threat to social value and profit, its nature is stylized and stylized by mass media.Method of Presentation; moral barrier edited It consists of people, bishops, politicians, and other thoughtful people; socially recognized experts publish their diagnosis and solutions; their reactions evolve (more frequently).

Essentially, what we deal with here is a moral panic. Cohen defines moral panic in the study of 'folk demon and moral panic' in 1972. Cohen defines moral panic as "(a) condition, conspiracy, character, or group is defined as a threat to social value and benefit". Further sociological studies on moral panic are proportions and fluctuations as concerns, hostility, agreement, and failure

In 1971, Stanley Cohen investigated a series of "moral panic". Cohen used the term "moral panic" to explain the reaction of young people, media to violence, public and socially dominated agents. This work, including remodeling and lockers, shows how socially managed agents amplify bias. According to Cohen, these groups are considered not to be part of the core values ​​of the bilateral agreement, pose a threat to society's value and the society itself, hence it is called "folk devil" It is.

Cohen (1972) advertises the word moral panic among his classic works. It refers to the response of the media to a specific social group or activity that is defined as a threatening social consensus. The report causes anxiety and moral panic to the general public, which is putting pressure on authorities to manage problems and punish responsible groups. However, the problem of media concerns is disproportionate to the real threat to society by groups and activities.

Previous research on the study of moral panic theory has explored why and how to create a moral panic. However, few studies use five criteria to define an ethical panic to check whether moral panic occurs in a drug panic. In addition, the impact of ethical panic on substance abuse has been largely ignored affecting race and class influences. Lack of attention to race and class is amazing (Mann and Zatz, 2002) as media generally rely on racial stereotypes in reporting crime. In this research, the theory of moral panic was expanded by examining the drug structure of the print medium from the viewpoint of color and socio - economic status. Based on the analysis of the content of the four major newspapers, I looked to see if the racial and category of cocaine and methamphetamine users had influenced the description of the medication on the print media, and whether it would affect the official correspondence It was.