Monotonous Rainbow Fork

Sorry but this is really important if you are black or white, Michael Jackson. "There was a time when biscuits and butter did not necessarily form a perfect mixture of frozen dairy products, in other words blacks and whites are not necessarily well integrated.In addition to ethnicity, moral value is also Black or white In Arthur Miller's "Cru 埚", Salem citizens are morally separated by the consistency of faith and doubt. I will send an angel to purify the world of the sinful world.

They stand on another gold seller's website that leads to several important journals, including a branch of the road, a small street leading to the destination, and incorrect promises of rainbow and pony, and myspacedotcom. One of them can only tell the truth, others can only tell lies, asking questions, how do you decide which way is there?

If Tezos was once plagued by this sort of bug, it would of course have a difficult path. This is not just my normality (of course I support such a branch), this is mere factual representation. In this case, a hard fork occurs, which is considered a legitimate branch. In other cases, I can see Tezos block chains are hard to fork. For example, suppose you use pairing encryption with a new protocol upgrade. One possibility is to implement a pair encryption library in OCaml and include it in the update. Another way is to rely on existing libraries like Relic and PBC. For example, the current protocol relies on external libsodium to provide most encryption primitives. We also recommend including Zcash-Bellman library. Strictly speaking, adding external dependencies should be considered hard fork.

The hard fork is definitely not safe. If performed without proper preparation, testing, notification, agreement, it may cause chain fork and other problems. But hard forks are also necessary tools to add functionality to existing block chains. If done properly, they do not look like unimaginable dangers - Ethereum therefore successfully recorded records that were difficult to sort. Human perception of hard forks depends on where the block chain is displayed in the development and recruitment cycle. Some people think block chains are like the early World Wide Web - we are in the "Netscape era". I am more accurate, we are in a state like the early Internet - we are in the "ARPAnet era". We can not make full use of the possibilities of block chain technology. Therefore, it is important to upgrade to the current function. Inevitably, these upgrades are offered through hard forks.