Mongolia´s Stand on Weapons, Disarment and Outer Space

These laws prohibit various activities related to nuclear weapons, including the development, manufacture and other acquisition of nuclear weapons and their placement, transportation or examination. Mongolia continues to comply with the "Chemical Weapons Convention" regulation ratified on January 17, 1995, and States Parties shall not develop, produce or otherwise store, store or retain chemical weapons. Do not use chemical weapons, participate in military preparations for using chemical weapons, do not support, encourage or induce people to engage in activities prohibited by the Contracting Parties under the Convention.

The Space Convention (OST), the most widely accepted international space law document, establishes a simple and comprehensive system that limits the use of weapons of mass destruction in outer space or outer space. Apart from the fact that nuclear weapons are specifically mentioned, this term should be executed in the broadest sense, as the Space Act does not define weapons of mass destruction for that purpose. Given that chemical weapons and biological weapons are prohibited as a matter of the International Humanitarian Act (IHL) and temporary use of radiation weapons is still hypothetical, the content of the norms is mainly related to the use of nuclear weapons To do. Weapons, currently there is no such ban

Whether deploying spy satellites or testing weapons, the universe is becoming a stage for technology to demonstrate its power. What do you think about the International Space Act on the militarization of the universe? In this series of three questions (see here), Pavle Kilibarda (Geneva Academy) is about to explain the norms more widely. This leads to a more peaceful legal interpretation. The Space Convention (OST), the most widely accepted international space law document, establishes a simple and comprehensive system that limits the use of weapons of mass destruction in outer space or outer space. Aside from the fact that nuclear weapons are specifically mentioned, the term law should not be implemented in the broadest possible way since the Space Act does not define weapons of mass destruction for that purpose.

The general concept of the "peaceful use" of the universe and the more specific utilization system of weapons of mass destruction has been explored before, and the third aspect of the space law becomes "militarization" or "weaponization" It is relevant. International Space of Responsibility established by the Space Treaty (OST) and the 1972 Liability Treaty The review of the liability system is particularly important if the acceptance of space law does not generally prohibit the militarization of the universe . Although militarization in the broadest sense is legal, the concept of responsibility limits at least "the weaponization of the universe" (meaning the use of the universe to develop direct force in armed violence)