Military Women Should NOT Be Allowed in Combat Positions

For decades, the prospects of women participating in the ground combat and military at the forefront have proved to be controversial issues. The controversy arises from the criticism of the physical and male relationships of women, the association of situations related to sexuality in the military, and the history of failure of sexual integration training. But most importantly, women should not be allowed to fight in the front or the ground unless women can gladly meet the same test criteria as men.

Should women be in battle status? The War Rejection Law has dealt with this issue since the 1940's. Over time, the problem still exists. The army has increased the proportion of women who are permitted to participate and delegate women's job hunting activities and has increased the assigned position (Matthews, Ender, Laurence, & Rohall, 2009). - The problem of women's combat deployment, originally proposed in the War Refusal Act, is controversial because women play battle roles without proper training (Sanchez, 2011). While others do not accept, some positions are classified as acceptable. Who has the right to approve the exception and what exception was done

The idea of ​​a woman in battle is no longer uncommon. Physical power is important, but because the military still needs the intelligence women can bring, they should be able to serve as combat positions. Furthermore, prohibiting women from participating in battle can hurt their military career. Women account for only 10% of the recruitment staff, but they still occupy the majority of the military. Their recent acting has been backed by Congress and the public in order to strengthen the role of women in the military.

Until recently, women in the United States were unable to gain military assistance status and could not carry out military service in battle. In 2015, the Pentagon opened up all fighting activities to women, and as of 2016 the ban on women near the British army was lifted. (In other countries like Israel, women are allowed to serve longer in battle troops). Many people believe this is a positive step in achieving gender equality, but there is concern that increasing women's participation in battle roles may be inappropriate and even dangerous Yes.

Incorporating women into equality based battle roles is a positive movement by soldiers, soldiers, and the society they serve. Men and women deserve equal treatment and opportunities as long as they meet the same criteria. If both men and women do not meet the minimum standards, do not allow them to enter the military. Women can meet physical standards and training standards, and can improve the safety of troops and the state. With the support of most Americans, women are considered equivalent to male soldiers and should have the same opportunity to fight the role of battle.