No matter how you try to reduce it, television is the main source of social education today. According to the recent Carnegie Foundation Education Promotion Foundation, Ernesto Boyer, in addition to parents, television is the most influential and influential teacher for children. Mr. Boyer repeatedly believes that certain elements of television programs are informal courses taught to all children from a young age.
Overall, TV shows bring more damage than profit. Because children are less susceptible to violence and tend to mimic the content displayed on television, television programs can cause aggressive behavior and violence. Aggressive and violent acts are provided through other channels, but television is the main cause of such behavior. This is because they spend most of their time watching television compared to others. Because of the images of good and evil created by television programs, they can easily imitate violence. When they see more violent television programs they are not influenced by violent terrorism because they always see violence on the television program they are watching.
There are many speculations about the influence of TV dramas on childhood aggression. Two clear views on this issue is that violent television increases aggressive behavior and violent television does not increase aggressive behavior. Subsequent investigations suggest that there may be other intervention variables leading to attacks. These include IQ, social class, parental punishment, parent's aggression, genetic, environment, model and so on. Given all these factors, it is difficult to judge the causal relationship between violent television and aggression. I believe that this relationship is two-way. I think violent television will lead to aggressive behavior, but aggressive people tend to watch more violent television.