Metaphysical Realism and Matilal’s Theories on the Connection Between Words and Things

Matilal's theoretical summary on metaphysical realism and the relationship between words and things: for centuries, philosophy of speech and language, linguistics, and ontological resources are always important concerns It was. And more and more semiotic analysis. The philosophy of India has produced many different and often conflicting solutions comparable to equally dazzling types as seen in the ancient and modern west side.

Three preliminary comments are required. First of all, in recent philosophy there was much debate about the relationship between realism (understood as a metaphysical theory) and semantics on the essence of truth and its role in language understanding and language philosophy (see Dummett 1978) . And Devitt 1991a has a very different view on this subject. Regardless of the problem of relationship between metaphysics and semantics, the well-known and unrelated attribute of the truth predicate enables the assertion of purpose, attributes, and facts as an assertion on the authenticity of the sentence. Since:

The theory of truth consolidation is often associated with metaphysical realism. That traditional competitor, pragmatist, and coherent prover, and other epistemological truth theory are often associated with idealism, anti realism, or relativism. In recent years, these traditional competitors have been replaced by deflationary truth theory (at least from publishing space) and, to a lesser extent, identity theory (these new competitors are unrelated to anti-realityism) ). Recently, the other two methods are attracting considerable attention. One is the theory of truth. It is sometimes seen as a competitor against theory, sometimes considered a more free version. Others are diversity: It uses a communication account as a whole to describe one truth, but uses only one factor.