Metal Detectors in Schools

Recently I discussed the growing concern of children's schools about parents and school safety measures. Thanks to the increase in school violence and shooting incidents, they began expressing strong opinions, but pros and cons for metal detectors dominated the dialogue.

A poll of about 85 parents shows that 87% agree to use metal detectors at school. The reason for backing it is based on the safety of children and the strong deterrence against school weapons. People who disagree with the installation (13%) say that the use of metal detectors increases the bad learning environment, the distrust between students and educators, and the cost increases tuition fees. In general, most parents agree to use metal detectors at public schools, as it gives parents and children a sense of security at school. Parents believe that children do not function correctly when thinking that the learning environment is not safe. Children's emotions and social well-being affect the thinking process

Kent Trump, president of the National School Safety and Security Service, warns parents and the school not to respond too quickly to make decisions that could have a significant impact on school through cost and school image. We must consider the cost of hiring and training personnel and should avoid recognizing the prison based learning environment. As of March 2018, the view of the national school and the security service has not changed. If properly introduced, it can be used as a tool to reduce risk, but like any other single strategy, we can not provide what some people consider as "guarantee". They offer. "

The School Psychologist Association (NASP) believes that schools should not place emphasis on extreme physical security measures. They also reported that there is no clear evidence that metal detectors are used in schools, security cameras and security guards can prevent school violence.

In many cases, the discussion on school metal detectors will result in supporters seeking to use metal detectors, trying to "do their utmost to make the school safer". Opponents of school metal detectors often oppose They believe that metal detectors create "prison-like" environments, which will adversely affect the school's climate. Opponents also pointed out the cost of metal detectors. Kent Trump, Chairman of the National School Safety and Security Service Center, advises school administrators to carefully avoid subconscious reactions after school violence. In particular, he understands the reaction of normal parents, desires a more secure physics such as metal detectors and cameras, concrete "guarantee", but first examines the practicality of the implementation problem I believe we must. Regarding metal school metal detectors, Mr. Trump says as follows.

In areas where you are considering using metal detectors you may want to explore the choices of random metal detector operation and fixed metal detector procedure at school. Random metal detector scan can be performed randomly in school bus, school entrance, after school hours, after school activities, and related ways to prevent students from receiving security. The random metal detector program can also be used as a substitute for the stationary detector, bypassing some of the implementation barriers described above.

School safety officials and the media responded to stab wounds by seeking more metal detectors at school. The Wildlife Conservation Organization shares a building with a school from kindergarten to fifth grade without metal detectors at its entrance. Newspapers including the New York Times and The Wall Street Journal searched and interviewed the uneasy parents demanding protection of the police for children, including the installation of metal detectors like airports. Of 88 schools in New York, 88 schools are currently scanning students and visitors. At a press conference, when asked in time, the police officers agreed that the metal detectors "can stop" the attack.