Memory and History

Please use excerpts from Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud that we read in the class to explain the big differences between their common points and memories. It is widely believed that it is necessary to "learn from the past and change the future". In the context of memory and history, learning from the past will repeat history, cause no change. Marx, Nietzsche, Freud discussed the memory problem in modern context. Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud have different methods of dealing with elements of memory, but I believe that memory is dangerous and problematic.

Difference and importance of collective memory Pierre Nora, professor of history at the Academy of French Social Sciences, points out that the difference between memory and history is significant. Memory is life, it is still a permanent evolution, history is reconstruction on the one hand. Unlike history, history is representative of the past, so long as it is emotion and magic, it is clearly separated from memory. In contrast, the facts suitable for it, history contrastedly analyzed and need to be criticized. Because universal authority is required, everyone does not belong to anyone - memory is absolute, only history can imagine history.

History is what I want to talk about. To put it more precisely, memory - collective, public memory - it is a common history, living with its own vitality and borrowing the authority of the authority of moving, forgetting, creating, forgetting, enlightenment - Inherit undoubted truth There is no possibility of faith history. Public memory reforms the past: We explain that consensus in the past is simply worshiping the past. John Bodner wrote that this is an eternal and sacred expression of the past, "re-expression of reality" is ideal and not ambiguous.

This course examines the meanings and relationships between past and present, memory and history in anthropological discussions. Specifically, we are trying to analyze the conceptual and methodological boundaries between historical production and the collective memory paradigm. Topics to take up borders between the groups according to public and public history, alternative history, politics of memory, past ownership, writing and archiving, and ethnic boundaries, gender, and ethnicity It includes the role of the past story in that. Ethnicity and religious courses meet the second writing requirement