Memory - Our Version of History

The way that our historical version of memory - memory works in human mind continues to appeal to viewers. It accepts everything our senses can offer to it, preserves all of this information, and can recall recent and past memories based on our request. Patricia Hampl said in his personal memory "Uneasy doubt about the reliability of memory, drunken memory, after all, is not just memory" (131). Psychiatrists, psychologists, and writers continue to study the mystery of the relationship between heart and memory. It is a symbolic meaning of respec in the objective past, invention of our own historical version, and personal memory.

How do you remember the cells? Can you do it? If that is true? What if you know that you can influence or program that memory in some way? The older cells can evolve to our own, the difference is that our history has been in our history once, our mistakes are learned and then It can be avoided. Each one of us joins time and memory in an open connection, recombines the spiral form, and the spiral form of each nano release is slowly added, and we have many false rejection / killing / destruction I remember. Many of our goals come from here - have they been refused? Do you accept? We integrated several, we integrate every time we change, we may forget what is always lost, but by integrating we make survival safer.

The way that our historical version of memory - memory works in human mind continues to appeal to viewers. It accepts everything our senses can offer to it, preserves all of this information, and can recall recent and past memories based on our request. Patricia Hampl said in his personal memory "Uneasy doubt about the reliability of memory, drunken memory, after all, is not just memory" (131). Psychiatrists, psychologists, and writers continue to study the mystery of the relationship between heart and memory. It is a symbolic meaning of respec in the objective past, invention of our own historical version, and personal memory.

When a constitutiveist model of personal memory is applied to cultural history, its meaning is widespread. Just like personal memory, aggregate memory is always recreated, replacing the original memory with a higher version. Therefore, cultural memory becomes self-referential: it feeds itself, reminds of its own memory. The more memory a particular society or group remembers about events, the more collective memory will be. As I remember, mine is one thing. Cultural myths support the nation or group identity, just as false private memories enhance individuals' self continuity.