Imagine that one day you lost sight of TV. You lost all your connections with your favorite talk show, your CNN, your favorite cartoon and the world. For decades, the media has become one of the most powerful weapons in the world. As time goes by, more and more media such as television, magazines, the Internet etc are displayed. Until persuading us to purchase a specific item from news coverage, media is the only link connecting people and the world. However, violence against the media is seen everywhere, it is difficult to open a media source. You can not find violence on the screen, such as TV, Internet, print media, radio.
These articles provide information on media violence and audience impact. I personally believe that media violence does not affect the audience's aggression. The evidence of these articles supports my theory. Some people are inherently aggressive, and often confidence is misunderstood as aggressive. Television violence is reliable, and most people can distinguish facts from fiction. Regarding sports violence, hockey itself is a violent sport. Players and audiences recognize that violence is part of contact sports. Regardless of how the media sees them, they all win the game to win the game. Media does not directly affect viewer's aggression
There are still many problems with the factors that mediate the influence of media violence and its impact on criminal activity. Although the "scientific debate" on whether media violence increases aggression and violence has mostly passed (Anderson et al., 2003, p. 81), the strong influence, latency of media violence Psychological process no one can gain immunity from media violence. The influence on extreme forms of violence remains unknown. Many of the literature on the influence of violent media are based on the study of the influence of media violence on aggression. Review of the research, especially for crime attacks, yielded very different results and did not provide empirical evidence that explaining violent explanations could lead to crime (Savage, 2004). So far, the results of investigations on mediation of media violence that affect real life violence are contradictory.
Influence of 1100 technologies, media and popular culture on criminal acts that imitated crime and cyber crime
The panel of media violence experts called up by the National Institute of Mental Health in 2003 at the request of a US surgeon announced a comprehensive report on the influence of media violence on young people and media violence is important for young people The cause was clarified. Aggression and violence are 0.10 (0.312). However, the correlation coefficient of 0.31 in social science research believes that it is difficult to achieve due to unpredictable changes in human behavior, equivalent to 0.8.6 in medical research. The relationship with lung cancer is as strong and strong as the many public health risks physicians and the general public think natural, (Figure 2).